Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 373 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 4.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is just a bit better than Motorola razr (2019), with a 77.7 score against 75.2. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10. Even though the HTC One M9 is incredibly older and thicker than the Motorola razr (2019), it's design is still much lighter.
HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processor and an extra GPU. HTC One M9 features a much better looking screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit greater display pixel density.
The HTC One M9 counts with a way better camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the HTC One M9 also counts with a higher resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola razr (2019) counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The HTC One M9 counts with a little better battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 2840mAh battery capacity against 2510mAh.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the HTC One M9 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.