Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-02-06 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola razr (2019), having a score of 81 against 75.2. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10. Even though LG G7 ThinQ is older and somewhat thicker than Motorola razr (2019), it's body is still notably lighter.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Motorola razr (2019), although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The LG G7 ThinQ has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater number of pixels per inch in the screen and a way better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
LG G7 ThinQ takes way better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a back camera with a 16 mega-pixels resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ has better battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 20% greater battery size.
The LG G7 ThinQ not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.