Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 score. LG V35 ThinQ is an older and just a bit thicker cellphone than the Motorola razr (2019), but LG could make it a lot lighter anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a sharper display than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Motorola razr (2019). Both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots a lot better videos and photos than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same video frame rates, a 16 MP camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger aperture to capture better low light images.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2510mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG V35 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.