Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than the Motorola razr (2019), having an 81.2 score against 75.2. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). Even though the LG V40 ThinQ is older and a little thicker than Motorola razr (2019), it's construction is still lighter. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Motorola razr (2019). Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ has a much better screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a little larger display, a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better display density. LG V40 ThinQ features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way better camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low light situations. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with greater battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the LG V40 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.