Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Motorola razr (2019)'s overall score of 75.2. LG Velvet's body is thicker but somewhat lighter than the Motorola razr (2019), and both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. LG Velvet features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola razr (2019). Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
LG Velvet counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a little larger screen, a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1080 x 2460px. LG Velvet features much more memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 4300mAh battery size. LG Velvet captures way better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG Velvet also counts with a camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution.
The LG Velvet not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.