Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2019), getting a score of 80.8 against 75.2. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Nokia XR20 has 11 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10, so it provides the user a lot of extra features. Nokia XR20's body is newer, but notably thicker and noticeably heavier than the Motorola razr (2019).
The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a quite better pixels number in each display inch, a quite bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Motorola razr (2019) has just a little better processing power than Nokia XR20. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Nokia XR20 shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera. Nokia XR20 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Nokia XR20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has an 84 percent greater battery capacity.
The Nokia XR20 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.