Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-06 | -- |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 8.14 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A16 5G is slightly better than the Motorola razr (2019), with a overall score of 76.2 against 75.2. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A16 5G has newer 14 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A16 5G is a a bit lighter but thicker phone than the Motorola razr (2019).
Motorola razr (2019) has a much greater performance than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2019) also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A16 5G has a slightly better looking display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A16 5G has much more memory to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A16 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A16 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy A16 5G counts with a superior battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2510mAh.
Galaxy A16 5G not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.