Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | -- |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has an overall score of 82, which is slightly better than Motorola razr (2019)'s general score of 75.2. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has newer 11 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version, giving you some additional features. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a newer and incredibly lighter phone than Motorola razr (2019), but it's also somewhat thicker.
Motorola razr (2019) features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2019) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a quite greater pixel density, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only captures way better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a way better battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 99% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.