Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G is a bit better than Motorola razr (2019), having a overall score of 79.4 against 75.2. The Galaxy A35 5G body is much newer than the Motorola razr (2019)'s, although it's just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A35 5G has newer 14 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple additional features.
Motorola razr (2019) has a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a little sharper display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a just a little better pixels number per inch of display and a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a lot better camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way higher resolution back camera. Motorola razr (2019) and Galaxy A35 5G both count with really similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A35 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.