Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-06 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A40 is just a bit better than Motorola razr (2019), having a 79.6 score against 75.2. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A40 has a newer 11 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10. The Galaxy A40 is an older and thicker cellphone than the Motorola razr (2019), but Samsung could make it incredibly lighter anyway.
Galaxy A40 counts with a bit better display than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater screen density and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A40 features more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Motorola razr (2019) counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A40, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2019) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A40 features a better camera than Motorola razr (2019). Both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the same video frame rate, the same resolution back-facing camera and a same size diafragm aperture.
Galaxy A40 has longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity against 2510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.