Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is better than Motorola razr (2019), with a global score of 83.8 against 75.2. Galaxy A50's construction is lighter than the Motorola razr (2019), although it is just a bit thicker and was released about 11 months before. The Galaxy A50 has a CPU that's just as good as Motorola razr (2019)'s processing unit, and although the Galaxy A50 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a quite higher number of pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (Full HD) video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A50 also has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much better battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.