Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is much better than Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 general score. Galaxy A51's construction is somewhat thicker but somewhat lighter than Motorola razr (2019), and both were only released with a couple months difference. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has a more recent 11 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a little sharper display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit larger display and a little better pixel amount in each inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola razr (2019) and Galaxy A51 both feature really similar processing units, and although the Galaxy A51 has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A51 captures much better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A51 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.