Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s global score of 75.2. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is just a little bit lighter but much thicker than Motorola razr (2019), and both of them were only released 3 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a little bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a quite higher number of pixels per inch of display and a little bit bigger display. Motorola razr (2019) and Samsung Galaxy A51 5G both count with similar processors, both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy A51 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a really longer battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 79% greater battery size.
Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.