Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is way better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s score of 75.2. Galaxy A52 is a newer and a little lighter cellphone than Motorola razr (2019), although it is somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little larger display.
The Galaxy A52 features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Motorola razr (2019) and the Galaxy A52 feature similar CPUs, both of them have 8 cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2510mAh. Galaxy A52 counts with a lot better camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.