Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than Motorola razr (2019), having a 91.3 score against 75.2. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10, giving you a couple additional features and performance enhancements. The Galaxy A52 5G design is newer and a bit lighter than Motorola razr (2019)'s, but it's also somewhat thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little bigger screen and a bit better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in Motorola razr (2019), both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 79% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G takes greater photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.