Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is way better than Motorola razr (2019), with a 91.1 score against 75.2. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10, so it counts with a couple additional features. Samsung Galaxy A52s's body is newer and a bit lighter, but somewhat thicker than the Motorola razr (2019).
Galaxy A52s counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2019). Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. Galaxy A52s has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a little bit higher pixels quantity per inch of display, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little larger screen.
The Galaxy A52s has much more storage for games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52s also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s takes greater photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.