Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A6 is a little bit better than the Motorola razr (2019), getting a 75.8 score against 75.2. The Galaxy A6 is an older and a little thicker device than the Motorola razr (2019), but Samsung was able to make it lighter anyway. Motorola razr (2019) counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2019) also has more RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2019) counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a higher resolution of 876 x 2142, a bit bigger screen and a greater number of pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy A6 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019). They have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate, the same resolution back camera and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition.
The Motorola razr (2019) features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A6 features improved battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2510mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A6 is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.