Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than Motorola razr (2019)'s overall score of 75.2. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has a newer 11 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A71 and the Motorola razr (2019) were released with only a couple of months difference, Samsung Galaxy A71's design is just a little bit thicker but somewhat lighter than the Motorola razr (2019).
Samsung Galaxy A71's CPU is just as good as the Motorola razr (2019) one, both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a bit better count of pixels in each inch of display, a little bit bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A71 counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 takes a lot better videos and photos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a very superior battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.