Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is way better than Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and Motorola razr (2019) were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is thicker but just a little lighter. These phones use the same Android 10 OS.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit better screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit bigger display and a little better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a little better performance than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A71 5G UW captures way better videos and photos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much longer battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.