Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-02-06 | -- |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 4.48 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Alpha is just a bit better than Motorola razr (2019), with a general score of 76.3 against 75.2. These phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Alpha has the newer 4.4.4 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy Alpha is a a lot lighter and just a bit thinner phone than the Motorola razr (2019).
Galaxy Alpha counts with a little sharper display than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a really smaller display, a way worse 1280 x 720 resolution and a little bit lower screen pixels density. The Galaxy Alpha has a bit faster processor than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has 4 less processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor.
Galaxy Alpha shoots better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution and a lot tinier aperture. The Motorola razr (2019) counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola razr (2019) counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 2510mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy Alpha is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.