Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a general score of 85.2, which is much better than Motorola razr (2019)'s overall score of 75.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy F41 and Motorola razr (2019) were released only a couple months apart, the Samsung Galaxy F41 body is a little bit lighter but notably thicker than Motorola razr (2019). Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy F41 has newer 11 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version, counting with some extra features.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features a little better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2019). They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy F41 features a little sharper display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a quite larger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a just a bit higher screen density.
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy F41 has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy F41 counts with a greater camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.