Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-06 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than Motorola razr (2019)'s overall score of 75.2. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design has the same thickness than the Motorola razr (2019), but it is much heavier. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10, counting with a couple nice extra features.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a little sharper display than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a higher 1536 x 2152 resolution. The Galaxy Fold counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 512 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Fold has a bit better CPU than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold takes way better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a back-facing camera with way less megapixels and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a very superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Fold costs more money than the Motorola razr (2019), but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.