Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-06 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M40 has a score of 85, which is better than Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 general score. Although the Samsung Galaxy M40 and Motorola razr (2019) were released only a few months apart, the Samsung Galaxy M40 construction is lighter but also thicker. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should give you very similar operating system features.
The Motorola razr (2019) counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M40. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy M40 has a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a just a bit greater pixels density, a quite bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Galaxy M40 has much more storage to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy M40 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy M40 has a very superior camera than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M40 also has a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.