Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is way better than Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 body is just a bit lighter but somewhat thicker than Motorola razr (2019), and they were released with only 7 months difference. Galaxy Note 20 features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a quite bigger display, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 has a way better camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a lot worse 12 MP resolution back camera and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images, it also counts with a lot higher video quality.
Motorola razr (2019) and Galaxy Note 20 count with really similar memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a much longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 71% bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.