Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 overall score. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10, so it provides a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola razr (2019).
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better CPU than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a way better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a quite larger screen and a higher pixel density.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a way higher resolution back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 79% larger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is also cheap compared to the Motorola razr (2019).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.