Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2019), getting a general score of 81.2 against 75.2. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is much older and somewhat thicker than Motorola razr (2019), it's construction is still somewhat lighter. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a much better screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better screen density and a quite better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. Galaxy Note 3 and Motorola razr (2019) have really similar processors, because although the Galaxy Note 3 has less cores and 3 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Galaxy Note 3 features a better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition, a way smaller aperture which is not nice for taking images in low-light environments and a back camera with a worse resolution. Motorola razr (2019) counts with just a bit more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 features greater battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 27% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.