Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 overall score. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version. Galaxy Note 5 is a noticeably older and a little bit thicker device than Motorola razr (2019), but Samsung was able to build it somewhat lighter anyway.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a brighter display than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixel number in each inch of screen. Motorola razr (2019) counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola razr (2019) has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy Note 5 features longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2510mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, they both have a 16 MP back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.