Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is a bit better than Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 overall score. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's construction is lighter than Motorola razr (2019), but it is somewhat thicker and was released 3 years before. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a CPU that's very similar to the processing unit in Motorola razr (2019), and although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition captures much better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels, they both have a F1.7 aperture.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features longer battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity against 2510mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is also by far the cheapest, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.