Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s general score of 75.2. Even though the Galaxy Note10 and the Motorola razr (2019) were released with only a couple months difference, Galaxy Note10's design is lighter but thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little faster CPU than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a just a bit better display pixel density, a bit larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px. Galaxy Note10 counts with a greater camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a way lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photography.
Galaxy Note10 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), because it has more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a really longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.