Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is much better than Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite construction is a little lighter but incredibly thicker than Motorola razr (2019), and both were released only 1 months apart. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a more recent 11 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has just a bit better processing power than Motorola razr (2019). They have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a just a bit better pixel count in each inch of display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite takes greater videos and photos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a way less megapixels back camera and a worse video quality, they both have the same aperture. The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.