Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2019), getting a score of 77.7 against 75.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 body is somewhat lighter than Motorola razr (2019), but it is thicker and was released many years before. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features and better performance.
Motorola razr (2019) has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Note3, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (although slower). Samsung Galaxy Note3 and Motorola razr (2019) count with very similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher display pixel density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a much better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited situations and a worse resolution back facing camera. Motorola razr (2019) has a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 has longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 3200mAh battery size instead of 2510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.