Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note4 is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2019), getting a score of 77.6 against 75.2. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Note4 is notably older and thicker than Motorola razr (2019), it's body is still lighter. Motorola razr (2019) features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2019) also has more RAM.
Galaxy Note4 has a slightly better display than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Galaxy Note4 counts with a lot better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, they both have a same resolution back camera, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition.
Motorola razr (2019) counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has improved battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 28 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.