Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has an overall score of 80.2, which is a bit better than Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 body is lighter than the Motorola razr (2019), but it's a little thicker and was released 5 years before. Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit better screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Motorola razr (2019) features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2019) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, they both have the same video frame rates, a 16 megapixels resolution back camera and the same video quality.
Motorola razr (2019) counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal memory. Galaxy Note5 features superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.