Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-06 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 is better than the Motorola razr (2019), with an 83 score against 75.2. The Galaxy Note8 design is a little bit lighter than Motorola razr (2019), but it's much thicker and was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but Galaxy Note8 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version, giving some nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2019). Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM. The Galaxy Note8 features a better screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a lot better 1440 x 2960 resolution, a bit bigger screen and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 features a little bit better storage to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note8 shoots much better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with way less megapixels, they both have a same size aperture.
The Galaxy Note8 counts with improved battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note8 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.