Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 score. Galaxy S10e's body is notably lighter than Motorola razr (2019), but it is thicker and was released only 11 months before. Galaxy S10e features a little bit better performance than Motorola razr (2019). Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater display density and a little higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution. Galaxy S10e captures a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a lot less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low-light situations.
The Galaxy S10e features a much better memory for games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S10e features greater battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 3100mAh battery capacity instead of 2510mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S10e is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.