Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is way better than Motorola razr (2019), having a global score of 94.8 against 75.2. The Samsung Galaxy S20 design is incredibly lighter but somewhat thicker than the Motorola razr (2019), and both of them were only released 1 months apart. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10.
The Galaxy S20 features a brighter screen than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy S20 also has way more pixels per inch of display and a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution. Galaxy S20 features much more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 has a much longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 59% more battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 features a much better camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller aperture and a camera with much less mega pixels, it also counts with a lot higher video quality.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S20 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.