Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is a lot better than Motorola razr (2019)'s overall score of 75.2. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has a more recent 11 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version. Even though the Galaxy S20 FE and the Motorola razr (2019) were released with only 8 months difference, Galaxy S20 FE's design is a little bit lighter but also somewhat thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a bit larger display, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little higher pixels count per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2019). Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a greater camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a much worse resolution back-facing camera, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and/or video in poorly lited environments. Galaxy S20 FE has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 79 percent more battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.