Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is much better than Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 global score. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features and increased performance. The Samsung Galaxy S22 design is extremely newer and somewhat lighter, but a little bit thicker than the Motorola razr (2019).
Galaxy S22 counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S22 has as much memory to install games and applications as the Motorola razr (2019), they have equal internal storage.
Galaxy S22 features a bit better processor than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 takes way better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution.
The Galaxy S22 features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S22 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.