Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 general score. Even though Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than the Motorola razr (2019), it is a lot thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version, providing you a lot of extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better looking display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a much better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a better count of pixels per inch of display and a little bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera with much more MP. The Galaxy S22 Ultra's memory capacity for applications and games is just as good as Motorola razr (2019)'s one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.