Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-06 | -- |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 7.23 ounces | -- |
| Blush gold and Noir black | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s global score of 75.2. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a noticeably lighter and much thinner phone than Motorola razr (2019). Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple additional features and performance improvements.
Motorola razr (2019) counts with a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality. Motorola razr (2019) and Samsung Galaxy S25 both feature quite similar memory capacity to install games and applications, both of them have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 59% greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S25 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.