Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Plus is slightly better than the Motorola razr (2019), having a 78.1 score against 75.2. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S5 Plus has a newer 4.4.2 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10, so it offers a couple additional features. Galaxy S5 Plus is an a lot older and thicker phone than the Motorola razr (2019), but Samsung made it much lighter anyway.
The Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a better screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
Motorola razr (2019) counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S5 Plus has just a little better battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 2800mAh battery size against 2510mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a lot better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and video in poorly lited environments, they both have a camera in the back with a 16 megapixels, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.