Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport is slightly better than Motorola razr (2019), having a 77.8 score against 75.2. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy S5 Sport has a newer 4.4.2 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10. Galaxy S5 Sport is a notably older and way thicker phone than the Motorola razr (2019), but Samsung was able to make it lighter anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a little bit better performance than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a sharper display than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a lot better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a 16 MP camera in the back.
The Motorola razr (2019) counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with just a bit better battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 12 percent greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.