Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-02-06 | -- |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | -- |
| Blush gold and Noir black | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Active is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2019), getting an 80.9 score against 75.2. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S6 Active has an older 5.0 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10. The Galaxy S6 Active body is much lighter but thicker than Motorola razr (2019).
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a little faster CPU than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processor and an additional GPU. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a much sharper screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better pixels quantity per screen inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same resolution back-facing camera. The Motorola razr (2019) has a superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy S6 Active features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S6 Active is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.