Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than the Motorola razr (2019), getting a 79.5 score against 75.2. The Galaxy S7 body is incredibly lighter than Motorola razr (2019), but it's somewhat thicker and was released 4 years before. Samsung Galaxy S7 has an incredibly better looking display than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot greater pixel density.
Motorola razr (2019) counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a larger number of 2.2 GHz cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola razr (2019) features a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a greater camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution and a worse video quality, they both have a F1.7 aperture. The Galaxy S7 has better battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S7 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.