Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2019), having a general score of 75.8 against 75.2. The Galaxy S7 Active construction is a little lighter than the Motorola razr (2019), although it is much thicker and was released many years before. Motorola razr (2019) counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S7 Active features a much better display than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a back-facing camera with a way worse 12 MP resolution and a lower (4K) video quality, they both have the same aperture.
The Motorola razr (2019) counts with more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a much better battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 59% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy S7 Active is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.