Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-02-06 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has an overall score of 78.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 global score. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is a way older and a little bit thicker cellphone than Motorola razr (2019), but Samsung was able to make it notably lighter anyway. These phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10, giving some nice extra features and performance improvements.
Galaxy S7 edge has a slightly better screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola razr (2019) features a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Motorola razr (2019) has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a greater camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a much less megapixels back camera, they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture.
Galaxy S7 edge features a really longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.