Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is just a bit better than Motorola razr (2019), with a global score of 81.7 against 75.2. Despite of the fact Galaxy S8 is way older and thicker than the Motorola razr (2019), it's design is still incredibly lighter. The Galaxy S8 counts with a better looking screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a much better pixel amount per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has a processing unit that is just as good as the Motorola razr (2019) one, and although the Samsung Galaxy S8 has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy S8 has slightly more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has longer battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2510mAh. The Galaxy S8 takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels, they both have a F1.7 camera aperture.
The Galaxy S8 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.