Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s score of 75.2. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active design is a lot older, just a little heavier and way thicker than Motorola razr (2019). The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a brighter screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a way greater display density.
Galaxy S8 Active has a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Motorola razr (2019) and the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active both count with similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S8 Active counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a worse video definition and a lot less megapixels resolution back facing camera, they both have a same size aperture.
The Galaxy S8 Active is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.