Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is much better than the Motorola razr (2019), having an 83.3 score against 75.2. The Galaxy S9 construction is notably lighter than the Motorola razr (2019), but it is thicker and was released around a year before. Galaxy S9 counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a brighter screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and a lot higher pixel amount per screen inch. Galaxy S9 counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 400 GB.
The Galaxy S9 takes way better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a much worse 12 MP resolution back camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture. Galaxy S9 counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2510mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S9 is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.