Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 8.14 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2019), having a score of 77.6 against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's design is a lot newer, but somewhat heavier and a lot thicker than Motorola razr (2019). Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a newer 12 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10, so it offers some nice extra features.
The Motorola razr (2019) counts with a lot better processing power than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola razr (2019) counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a bit inferior pixels count in each inch of display, a bit smaller screen and a bit worse 876 x 2142px resolution.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a better camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs in low-light environments, it also counts with a back camera with a much better 50 MP resolution. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.